In H.G. Well’s classic, The Time Machine, a genius scientist does the seemingly impossible—he invents a machine capable of moving forward and backward through time. Now, I must admit to you that I watched the 2002 movie that was only loosely based on the book years before I actually got around to reading the literally timeless novel, and, honestly, there are parts of the story line that I like better in the film adaption.
The main change in the storyline between the novel and film is the protagonist’s reasoning behind building his time machine. In the book, he builds it solely out of scientific drive and curiosity. In the movie, he builds it in hope of reuniting with his love, who died years before on the day he proposed to her.
Isn’t it interesting how much of our cultural imagination is wrapped up in mastering time? Throughout the media mediums are stories and musings that focus on people trying to go back in time to change something from their past, or trying to go to the future to see how things work out for them if they follow a certain path. We want to have control of every aspect of our lives, and we want to know that we made the best possible decision that we could in every instance.
In The Time Machine, though, the protagonist learns that no matter what he does to try to change the past, no matter how many times he saves his fiancé from the doom awaiting her in the future, it only prolongs the inevitable. Every time she is rescued from one fate, she falls into the hands of another fatal accident.
Even with a time machine, he cannot change the past.